Nationalism
emphasizes the communal ideology of the state and is the caution and assertion
aiming for its unification, independence, and development. It was taught to
people around the world in positive values throughout WW I and WW II, and the
rubble remains all over the world.
However,
some experts, such as Zakaria, point to the dangers by arguing the shortcomings
of such nationalism. Zakaria wrote in his book “The post-American world” how he
thinks of nationalism. He claimed that “As a number of players increases and each
one’s power and confidence grows, the prospects for agreement and common action
diminish,” (34). He argues that nationalism will hinder the formation of a new
community these days when globalization is on the rise.
He
cited a dialogue with the Chinese, for example, while he met Chinese in
Shangai. While responding with common sense, the Chinese reacted unreasonably in
the dialogue about Taiwan and Japan. (35) It is argued that even in normal
judgment, people with strong nationalism will not be able to make proper value
judgments about their country, which will be an unstable factor of
globalization.
Puerto
Rico, like other islands in the Caribbean, was originally the home of Tiano
natives but changed its fate when Columbus arrived on the island during the
second voyage in 1493. After that he Puerto Rica spend 400 years in a Spanish
colony and was controlled by the United States after American troops landed in
1898.
Spain’s
Puerto Rico colonial policy was followed by the conquests and looting that
Spain carried out in general. Infuriated by barbaric colonial rule, the
indigenous people rioted against the early conquerors of the colony but failed
to expel the colonists, sneaking into the mountainous regions to develop a
persistent struggle. In 1514, Puerto Rico, unlike other colonies, gave measures
to allow marriage between white and indigenous people, whose purpose was to
promote the settlement of gold miners who flocked to the population, the spread
of Christianity, and the discovery of gold mines at that time. As a result of
this policy, ethnic conflicts in other colonies have not been raised in Puerto
Rico.
Only in
the late 1800s did the conflict begin as the U.S. occupied the country. Puerto
Rico’s ethnic conflict is sharply divided into the pros and cons of whether to
join the United States. This phenomenon is a deep-rooted battle that spreads
through Puerto Rico, from politics to individual conflicts.
Puerto
Rico’s mood is on the decline of nationalists, with only 1% support for
independence, which was strong in the 1950s. The ruling party is claiming to
have autonomy as it is today, and the opposition party is claiming to be a
state in the United States.
The
ruling party and their supporters insisted that its current position in Puerto
Rico is closely related to the United States and that economic benefits can
gain. The ruling party’s governor, Rafael Hernandez, maintains that he
maintains this tradition of the Hispanic world and continues to take advantage
of the economic benefits gained from the special status of the United States.
It is
also argued that incorporating a state in the United States sells the country
because residents have to pay income taxes and U.S. companies that don’t
receive tax exemptions are reluctant to invest.
Rafel Hernandez
Puerto Rico’s economy has a high GDP per capita of
$24k, and the major industries are pharmaceutical and electronics manufacturing
bases, but the gap between the rich and the poor has a high GINI coefficient.
How to declare Puerto Rico’s economy is ruined.
The
Gini coefficient is 0.54 in 2019, about 0.05 higher than the U.S. Quite high. It
is startling that Puerto Rico has a GINI coefficient. 57The the gap between the rich and the poor is enormous, although the Caribbean is not an
economically poor area (except Haiti) but a narrow island.
The Puerto Rican government provides tax and other
benefits to finance a small number of investors. Rather than tightening their
debts, they use hedge funds or financial investors with large investments.
Puerto Rico has established a tax exemption policy for
investors and billionaires at Wall Street in the U.S. to raise large sums of
money from 2012. As a result, Wall Street’s private investors and U.S. super-riches
have often seen migration or investment in Puerto Rico for the purpose of
escaping the economy. Experts point out that Puerto Rico’s policies promote the
gap between rich and poor rather than improving national finances. Residents
are struggling with taxation and fiscal austerity, and they explain that the
government only deals with financial investors.
Source = https://datausa.io/profile/geo/puerto-rico/
https://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/book/inequality-puerto-rico

No comments:
Post a Comment